RSS Feed (xml)
Assalamualaikum wbt...
Aku mendapat assignment daripada lecturer subject "Halal Food Management", yang dalam kuliah agak 'panas' dgn persoalan-persoalan drpd student. Tajuk assignment: Forbidden Animal in Islam and Istihalah in this Products. Aku cukup takut membuat assignment ini sebab belum dapat maklumat-maklumat kukuh tntg Al-Istihalah, sejauh mana ia diterima oleh ulama-ulama muktabar dalam menentukan kehalalan sesuatu produk. Takut menyebarkan maklumat yang salah. Tapi alhamdulillah, mujur lecturer, Dr. Tajul adalah seorg yg open-minded dan sentiasa menerima soalan-soalan dan buka diskusi untuk student2 nya.
Cari punya cari, terjumpa satu forum diskusi daripada Indonesia, cerita bab bactosoytone dan istihalah... Alhamdulillah. Di sini aku pastekan untuk tambahan knowledge pembaca sekalian... Bukalah minda anda untuk berfikir. Jangan menjadi manusia yg terlalu 'rigid' dan t'aasub...
_____________________
assalamu'alaikum warahmatullahi wabarakaatuh
Catatan: saya tinggal di NY dan sampai saat ini masih selalu memilih makanan yang ada logo halal dan/atau logo kosher (utk non meat). Dan artikel di bawah ini hanya saya gunakan sebagai wawasan pengetahuan tanpa membuat saya menjadi taqlid.
artikel di bawah ini menerangkan konsep istihalah, perubahan materi. seperti dari wine menjadi cuka, dll.
Artikel ini ditulis oleh ulama kaliber seperti Syeikh M. Bazmool dan Syeikh Nasiruddin Albaani (salah satu muhadist terbaik abad 20). Silakan di google.
Dalam masalah fiqih akan selalu ada perbedaan dan selama perbedaan itu dilandasi dalil dan argumentasi yang kuat, maka kita patut menghargainya.
Contoh: teman-teman saya yang bermazhab hanafi menajiskan alkohol apapun bentuknya. Sedangkan kita memiliki pengertian bahwa alkohol tidak najis, yang najis adalah khamr nya.
berikut ini artikelnya:
Sh Muhammad Bazmool is a well known Scholar of fiqh from Mecca and the translation is by Moosa Richardson also a well know Canadian student of knowledge studying at the university of Hadeeth in Mecca.
Bismillahi wa salaatu wa salaamu 'alaa rasulillah,
(Taken entirely from a dars given by Sh. Muhammad Bazmool, translated by Moosa Richardson and a fatwa given by Sh. Nasiruddin al-Albaani)
Istihala is when something becomes pure. It was najis (impure) but it is now taahir (pure). A good example would be maitah (animal carcass): it is najis, but should it be burned and become ashes, or decompose and become earth, then it is taahir, it is no longer
najis. This can happen with dung or feces or whatever. Whenever something changes from one property to another, then the ruling likewise changes.
Example: Let us say that someone uses the fat of a dead animal to make soap. That fat is najis, but the chemical change that it was put through makes it taahir.
Ibn Hazm put it concisely when he said,
"Ruling upon an object is upon what it is named (what it is), if the name (what it is) changes then so does the ruling."
He also mentioned in his book of fiqh, Al-Muhalla: "If the quality of the substance of naturally impure objects changes the name which was given to it so that it is no more applicable to it and it is given a new name which is given to a pure object, so it is no more an impure thing. It becomes a new object, with a new rule."
Meaning that if the natural composition of a substance changes to another substance of a different composition, so much so that you can no longer call the new substance by the name of what it was-- ruling upon that substance changes too.
Proof/Example 1:
The companions (radyallahu anhum) used to eat a cheese that came from the land of the disbelievers. In that cheese was a part of the calf which was slaughtered by the disbelievers in a way that is not in accordance with Islaam. The companions knew this, but they also
knew that the prohibition was upon the calf, what is directly from the calf, and what could be properly called part of the calf; the ruling is not upon that which you cannot identify as part of the calf nor is it called any longer such-and-such part of the calf. This is called istihala.
Proof/Example 2:
Another proof from the Sunnah: The Prophet (sallallahu 'alayhi wa sallam) forbade making vinegar out of wine, but he said that if you should come across vinegar that has been made from wine then it is halaal.
Why?
The ruling is upon what the object is, and not what it was. Wine is haraam; vinegar is not, and before the wine became an intoxicant, it was halaal. Why? Because it was fruit before that.
Proof/Example 3:
Allah says in the Qur'an:
"And surely there is a lesson for you in the cattle we give you to drink of what is in their bellies from between the feces and blood, pure milk, wholesome to those who drink it." (16:66)
Allah is putting forth an example for us of how something pure can come from something impure.
And we can also use as proof something that we've already gone over. The Prophet (sallallahu 'alayhi wa sallam) said that when the hide of maitah (the carrion) is tanned, then it is taahir. He (sallallahu 'alayhi wa sallam) gave us a method to purify something which was first impure.
Let us examine things we are familiar with: mono and diglycerides, whey, gluten, emulsifiers, gelatin, and whatever else is on the international haraam list. These by-products sometimes come from animals, pigs even, in which case the ruling on the initial substances is that they are haraam. But the initial substances (e.g. fat, marrow, cartilage, etc.) are put through chemical change so that you no longer can even call it "pig fat" or "animal bone" or "skin" or
"cartilage", etc. because it is no longer that, hence it is taahir, it is halaal.
What is gelatin? As Oxford dictionary of science defines: "A colorless or pale yellow, water-soluble protein obtained by boiling collagen with water andevaporating the solution. It melts when water is addedand dissolves in hot water to form a solution that
sets to a gel on cooling." (page 290)
Is this a chemical change or is this not a chemical change? Is it protein any longer? No, it is not.
You are in disbelief so you ask, "But how can it be halaal when it came from something haraam?"
Because of the proofs mentioned above, the ruling is not based upon what it was, the ruling is based upon what it is. A Hanafi scholar, Ibn Abedin gave the example: "the swine which drowns in a salt lake and decomposes and becomes salt itself, is now halaal."
And other Hanafi scholars go on to say: "salt is different from meat and bones. If they become salt, they are salt."
To take the salt example further: salt consists of sodium chloride (NaCl) when together they are the halaal food known as salt, when separated they make up two poisonous substances which are then haraam for consumption.
The ahnaaf (Hanafis) also use as an example the human semen, saying that it is najis, then when it inseminates the egg and becomes a blood clot it is still najis, but when it becomes flesh it is no longer najis. And the ahnaaf are not the only ones who take this position.
The examples are numerous and they extend beyond food:
Yesterday a man was kaafir and going towards Hell, today he is Muslim, so what is the ruling upon him? It is based upon what he is today.
We must be careful when we call things haraam because it is a form of thulm (oppression) . Scholars have said that it is worse that you make something halaal to haraam rather than making something haraam to halaal. This deen Allah has made yusr (easy) let us not make
it 'usr (hard). Wallahu 'Alim.
source: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Halal-Baik-Enak/message/9647
Kolam hiasan
6 years ago
